Vol. 78, No. 3

INTRODUCTION
Nancy S. Marder

I. LESSONS FROM THE PAST

THE ORIGINS OF FELONY JURY SENTENCING IN THE UNITED STATES
Nancy J. King

II. THE JURY AND RACE

HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT RACE AND JURIES? A REVIEW OF SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORY AND RESEARCH
Samuel R. Sommers and Phoebe C. Ellsworth

RACE, DIVERSITY, AND JURY COMPOSITION: BATTERING AND BOLSTERING LEGITIMACY
Leslie Ellis and Shari Seidman Diamond

III. THE JURY IN PRACTICE

A VOIR DIRE OF VOIR DIRE: LISTENING TO JUROR’S VIEWS REGARDING THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
Mary R. Rose

THE CURRENT DEBATE ON JUROR QUESTIONS: “TO ASK OR NOT TO ASK, THAT IS THE QUESTION”
Nicole L. Mott

JURORS AND THE FUTURE OF “TORT REFORM”
Judge B. Michael Dann (ret.)

WHEN ALL OF US ARE VICTIMS: JUROR PREJUDICE AND “TERRORIST” TRIALS
Neil Vidmar

AVOID BALD MEN AND PEOPLE WITH GREEN SOCKS? OTHER WAYS TO IMPROVE THE VOIR DIRE PROCESS IN JURY SELECTION
Valerie P. Hans and Alayna Jehle

DEATH OF AN ACCOUNTANT: THE JURY CONVICTS ARTHUR ANDERSEN OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Stephan Landsman

NULLIFICATION AT WORK? A GLIMPSE FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS STUDY OF HUNG JURIES
Paula L. Hannaford-Agor and Valerie P. Hans

IV. REINVIGORATING THE JURY

JURORS AS STATUTORY INTERPRETERS
Lawrence M. Solan

A CONSERVATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN JURY TRIAL
Robert P. Burns

PROOF BEYOND ALL POSSIBLE DOUBT: IS THERE A NEED FOR A HIGHER BURDEN OF PROOF WHEN THE SENTENCE MAY BE DEATH?
Judge Leonard B. Sand and Danielle L. Rose

STUDENT NOTES

TECHNOLOGY SERVICE SOLUTIONS: NEW WINE IN OLD WINESKINS?
Elizabeth A. Pawlicki, O.P.

THIS LAND IS MY LAND: THE NEED FOR A FEASIBILITY TEST IN EVALUATION OF TAKINGS FOR PUBLIC NECESSITY
Thomas J. Posey